IN THIS ISSUE

Cover Page

President's Message

For Your Information

Members in the News

On the Boards

Design Lecture Series

Editor's Page

Legislative Day Report

Architecture and Environmentalism

We're Not Ready for Sustainability

Shades of Green

USGBC and LEED™

New/Reinstating Members

Board of Directors

   
 

Shades of Green

By Lauren Shadid

A product sales representative visits your office and is excited to tell you about their innovative “Green,” “Sustainable,” or “Environmental” product.

You:

  1. Think “Great! I will go back to my desk and quickly specify this on my project”.
  2. Immediately toss the product in the trash, attempting to avoid anything termed “sustainable” at all costs.
  3. Begin an inquisitive dialogue with the product-rep to learn more about it.
  4. Call upon one of your local Sustainable Design Task Members for their recommendation.

If you answered ‘C’ or ‘D’, you are on the road to successfully reducing your project’s impact on the environment. The best thing to do at this point is to take a step back and look at the big picture. Architects and designers have an opportunity to have a much larger impact on the environment beyond simply calling for a recycled-content material over virgin goods. While the final products are important, it is the industries that produce those products that really tilt the scales of polluting or enriching the environment.

The real question is not, “What makes a product “sustainable”?”, rather, “What makes a company “sustainable”? Essentially, do they tread lightly upon the Earth through their operations?

There are some simple specific questions that you can ask to help you decide which companies you choose to support through your specifications. Where is the company located? Do they contribute to suburban sprawl, or do they operate in a community which fosters public-transportation / carpooling for their workers. Do they have local manufacturing / distribution which helps reduce the amount of fuel / transportation required to get the product to your job-site? (This is a factor in the Embodied Energy of a material). How is packaging handled for shipping once delivery has occurred? How do they manage waste within their production process? Is recycling of material, fuel and water implemented? How is their facility powered? Have they taken steps to reduce the amount of pollution caused by their manufacturing? Do they take steps to use recycled paper / material for their promotional literature, AND do they support methods other than junk mail for advertising such as electronic notices? Do they offer a buy-back program for removing and recycling their product after the useful life? Essentially, what natural resources are used to make this so-called green product and any of their other products? Does the manufacturing process of the “green” material actually require the consumption of more natural resources than the product’s counterpart in virgin goods?

 

Keep in mind that few things produced by man on this earth are 100% sustainable, so while it is important to try to specify recycled content or recyclable materials, it is even more crucial to support manufacturers that are really trying to walk the talk and not just tout a product’s “green” merits. It is important to recognize that there are various “shades of green.” This is where architects and designers have the greatest opportunity to have a positive impact on the environment. The road to green is often an uphill battle, therefore it is critical that companies attempting to make a difference receive our support.

Some companies will be overwhelmed with these kinds of questions, for while they may have interest in operating in a more sustainable fashion, there may be certain industrial or technological limitations to their processes. Obviously, small companies have more limited resources than the larger manufacturers. We shouldn’t be so naive as to hold them to the same expectations as “Interfaces” of the world. Still, we should encourage them to make gestures, even if they start out seemingly ever-so-small.

For example, I recently received a holiday card from Herman Miller. The card was printed on 100% recycled content paper. Rather than adding to the mountain of trinkets and redundant literature that I receive from so many manufacturers (which often ends up in the trash), they decided to put their money to good use and make a donation in my name to a charity of my choice from the four they offered. This is not to suggest that this is the only gesture that this company is making; however they still deserve to be commended. Making sustainable choices is something that needs to trickle down to the most mundane aspects of a business to be truly effective. Often a turn towards green means more green in their pocket. Encourage business associates who are skeptical to read Paul Hawken’s The Ecology of Commerce to find out more.

Some companies such as carpet manufacturer Interface and furniture manufacturer Wilkhahn actually publish information about their eco-activities. They have been proactive in developing in-house audits of their systems, operations and distribution methods and seek opportunities to improve upon the efficiency and sustainability of those methodologies. Both of the companies will readily admit that while they may be pioneers in the sustainable realm, they recognize that there continue to be opportunities where they can do more. The idea is that as a whole, they continue to research and implemented solutions to effect less of an impact on the environment.

In the end, walking-the-talk works both ways. It is up to the manufacturer to run their operation with sustainable goals, but it is up to us as architects and designers to recognize and support these companies for those efforts to make any difference.

 

TOP  

 

 
 
 

 

© Copyright 2004 AIAOC.  All Rights Reserved.

Newsletter designed and maintained by
    |    AIAOC would like to thank Dynamic Concepts Incorporated